SMT divergence indicates fake breakdown direction, not relative asset strength comparison.

And this is not the case, okay? So when you see Bitcoin make a lower low, and ETH makes a higher low, people will say, well, ETH made a higher low, Bitcoin made a lower low, so ETH must be stronger. I know that sounds correct logically, and you could be right, but what this is telling you is that this breakdown on Bitcoin is likely fake due to the S&T divergence, and we're actually gonna reverse. What it's not telling you is that ETH is going to be the one that trades higher than Bitcoin because it may a higher low, so it must be stronger. So what we're looking for is the direction, okay? S&T is telling us if our directional bias is going to be correct, and that this breakdown was indeed fake.